Read The Forum Rules: We have a clear set of rules to keep the forum running smoothly. Click here to review them.

Post Reply 
Naming your son '<your name> Jr'
Author Message
PixelFree Offline
Woodpecker
**

Posts: 358
Joined: Sep 2017
Reputation: 11
Post: #1
Naming your son '<your name> Jr'
Hey all.

I've noticed a trend where high status / wealthier men give their sons their own first name.

e.g. Donald Trump Jr, Mike Flynn Jr, etc.

I see it in America and here in Australia. Seems to be the more 'well to do' private school type people.

What's the deal with this?

I get the legacy aspect but to me it just makes things confusing and people close to you have to invent nick names 'Young Donald' etc. Naming your son after your granddad or giving him your name as his middle name sounds smarter.
01-19-2020 02:01 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
mr_ks Offline
Banned

Posts: 204
Joined: Jun 2019
Post: #2
RE: Naming your son '<your name> Jr'
Nothing wrong with being called 'Junior' your whole life, especially if your father is a well-to-do boomer.
01-19-2020 06:03 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes mr_ks's post:
NoMoreTO
PixelFree Offline
Woodpecker
**

Posts: 358
Joined: Sep 2017
Reputation: 11
Post: #3
RE: Naming your son '<your name> Jr'
I guess in Australia we don't use the 'Jr' suffix.

We go something like 'Don' and 'Donald', 'Mike' and 'Micheal' or 'old Don' / 'young Don', etc.

I wonder if there is any cultural or historical story here behind this?
01-19-2020 07:08 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Paracelsus Offline
Crow
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 6,302
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation: 150
Post: #4
RE: Naming your son '<your name> Jr'
(01-19-2020 02:01 AM)PixelFree Wrote:  Hey all.

I've noticed a trend where high status / wealthier men give their sons their own first name.

e.g. Donald Trump Jr, Mike Flynn Jr, etc.

I see it in America and here in Australia. Seems to be the more 'well to do' private school type people.

What's the deal with this?

I get the legacy aspect but to me it just makes things confusing and people close to you have to invent nick names 'Young Donald' etc. Naming your son after your granddad or giving him your name as his middle name sounds smarter.

It's inferiority complex on the part of people who want to be royalty but don't have the class, the psychological stability, or the breeding. It's not a matter of creating a legacy at all -- unless that's what said rich morons tell themselves to get to sleep at night. Rather, it's flat out narcissism and forcing a child who might have completely different ideas about how to run his life to take up all your sins and all your deeds, robbing him in the most fundamental way of his own identity.

I mean, good grief, even the bloody English royal family doesn't do this anymore.
Especially these days, a king's birth name has as much to do with his regnal name as birth name does for the guy on the Papal throne.

George VI's full name was Albert Frederick Arthur George - he took the name George because Albert was seen as too Germanic and because he wanted to keep continuity with his father George V's reign and minimise the disastrous reign of his elder brother Edward VIII. Queen Victoria was christened Alexandrina. George VI's grandfather, Edward VII, was Albert Edward. When he eventually winds up on the throne, Charles is likely to take the name George VII in honour of his grandfather and, ironically, to avoid the bad associations with the other kings who've had that name - Charles I (executed) and Charles II (reigned during the Great Fire of London, had 12 bastard children and no trueborn ones, was succeeded by James II who was deposed in 1688 by a European cousin).

It's telling that only the obscenely rich and the obscenely poor think it's a good idea to name your kids after yourself. But at least inbred peasants have the defence of literally not knowing any better. Well, mah name's John Lee Peddemore, same as mah Daddy and his Daddy before...

Remissas, discite, vivet.
God save us from people who mean well. -storm
(This post was last modified: 01-19-2020 09:25 AM by Paracelsus.)
01-19-2020 09:20 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 8 users Like Paracelsus's post:
Aurini, Rigsby, Number one bummer, burner-account, kruger41, gework, gringoed, Cast2e
mr_ks Offline
Banned

Posts: 204
Joined: Jun 2019
Post: #5
RE: Naming your son '<your name> Jr'
More interesting I think is that names all originally had some meaning, and still do today though the languages have evolved so we dont see the word (meaning) aspect of the name.

It's pretty crap having a name which is just a seemingly random sequence of sounds. Just a bit too arbitrary for my liking. At some point I think we need to start having names that are more personal again.

Legal names are mostly for the purpose of the state so they can keep tabs on you and follow you in paperwork. This is what names have become now. Real actual names (social and psychological aspect of names) are not often fixed and can be varying depending on social context (Regal Names for instance), time etc.
(This post was last modified: 01-19-2020 09:39 AM by mr_ks.)
01-19-2020 09:38 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
NoMoreTO Offline
Pelican
****

Posts: 1,199
Joined: Jan 2018
Reputation: 17
Post: #6
RE: Naming your son '<your name> Jr'
There is nothing wrong with this. I have seen this in my own family. When you get to four generations as I have seen in my family it is actually pretty nice, provides continuity, and is cool to have the IV behind your name. Maybe it is fake royalty copying, what's wrong with imitating Kings.

I can confirm there can be practical issues with mail, government documents etc. It was common to have confusion when someone called asking for someone, when there are 2 people in the house with that name. But the Muslims manage to sort it out.

Its also traditional & patriarchal. Feminist wives don't suggest naming your son after yourself. Prince Harrys' son won't be named Harry 2nd.

For professing themselves to be wise, they became fools. Rom 1:22
(This post was last modified: 01-19-2020 05:52 PM by NoMoreTO.)
01-19-2020 05:50 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes NoMoreTO's post:
robreke
007 Offline
Pigeon

Posts: 11
Joined: Dec 2019
Reputation: 0
Post: #7
RE: Naming your son '<your name> Jr'
Well, if you're well known, giving your name to your son can greatly help to open doors Banana
01-19-2020 07:44 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
PixelFree Offline
Woodpecker
**

Posts: 358
Joined: Sep 2017
Reputation: 11
Post: #8
RE: Naming your son '<your name> Jr'
(01-19-2020 09:20 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  George VI's full name was Albert Frederick Arthur George - he took the name George because Albert was seen as too Germanic and because he wanted to keep continuity with his father George V's reign

You mean he could have gone with King Arthur II and chose not to? Smile
01-20-2020 05:48 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Leonard D Neubache Offline
Owl
******
Gold Member

Posts: 13,443
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation: 216
Post: #9
RE: Naming your son '<your name> Jr'
I would avoid it if for no other reason than when your second son arrives (God willing) it's not going to put him on a very good track in life. Unless you're planning on naming all of your sons Pixelfree junior. Which would also suck.

God demands of Man responsibility. God demands of Woman vulnerability. These are their curse and blessing alike. Libertianism is to Man as Feminism is to Woman.
01-20-2020 09:05 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
rapaz12 Offline
Woodpecker
**

Posts: 298
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 6
Post: #10
RE: Naming your son '<your name> Jr'
I've never liked it. My son isn't me, so why would I give him my name?
01-21-2020 09:12 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes rapaz12's post:
burner-account
NoMoreTO Offline
Pelican
****

Posts: 1,199
Joined: Jan 2018
Reputation: 17
Post: #11
RE: Naming your son '<your name> Jr'
(01-20-2020 09:05 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  I would avoid it if for no other reason than when your second son arrives (God willing) it's not going to put him on a very good track in life. Unless you're planning on naming all of your sons Pixelfree junior. Which would also suck.

I'm a non Jr. - no issue here. First sons' had special privledges throughout history, maybe that is the way it should be.

This is a traditional thing, and modern society is really against it. They are against us shaping our son in our image so to speak. But if the Father is a good man, this is exactly what he should be doing.

All of this, "my kid is an individual and his uniqueness is for us to discover" is modern bull shit. Yes, we know each person is unique, but families also have an inheritance, an ethos, a tie to history and ancestry. Naming your child after a relative, or giving a JR. or II is a good thing.

For professing themselves to be wise, they became fools. Rom 1:22
(This post was last modified: 01-21-2020 10:48 AM by NoMoreTO.)
01-21-2020 10:47 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 5 users Like NoMoreTO's post:
PixelFree, Leonard D Neubache, gework, robreke, d'Aversa
PixelFree Offline
Woodpecker
**

Posts: 358
Joined: Sep 2017
Reputation: 11
Post: #12
RE: Naming your son '<your name> Jr'
(01-20-2020 09:05 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  I would avoid it if for no other reason than when your second son arrives (God willing) it's not going to put him on a very good track in life. Unless you're planning on naming all of your sons Pixelfree junior. Which would also suck.

I agree. I have no plans to do this, just noticed it was something wealthy people did and wondered the history and reasoning behind it.

One thing I do plan to do is give strong, traditional names - not stupid newly made up names.

I find it interesting to study how elite/wealthy peoples operate (how they network in particular) as well as just historical customs in general.

If it's a thing, there must be reasons for it, and it's good to see them come out in this thread.
(This post was last modified: 01-21-2020 06:25 PM by PixelFree.)
01-21-2020 06:21 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes PixelFree's post:
Leonard D Neubache
Rigsby Offline
Pelican
****
Gold Member

Posts: 1,667
Joined: May 2014
Reputation: 75
Post: #13
RE: Naming your son '<your name> Jr'
The problems really start when your name is 'Junior', and you decide to carry the tradition on.

Introducing your young son at the kindergarten:

Hi, this is Junior Junior!

Mmmkay. Who are you?

I'm Junior Senior!



If your name is actually 'Junior Senior' then don't even think about it!


(01-19-2020 09:20 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  It's telling that only the obscenely rich and the obscenely poor think it's a good idea to name your kids after yourself. But at least inbred peasants have the defence of literally not knowing any better. Well, mah name's John Lee Peddemore, same as mah Daddy and his Daddy before...


Well, mah name's John Lee Peddemore, same as mah Daddy and his Daddy before...


Well, MAH name is 'Junior Senior Junior III', same as mah Daddy and his Daddy before... except his Daddy was just called 'Junior Senior Junior II', and his Daddy 'Junior Senior Junior I', and his Daddy was just called 'Junior Senior' Senior, of course!

Pretty soon you end up in hot P pursuit in a situation like this chasing after people that just have a total disregard for da law:






...


I agree though, it robs agency from the child and only some kind of narc would do that. That kid is forever doomed to follow in Daddy's footsteps. Do women do this with daughters? What would be the female equivalent of inheritance from Mum to Daughter? Can't think of one right now.

Naming your son 'Junior' is a relic from a bygone age when children were more dependent on parents, and parents could pull that shit without being accused of child abuse (which it is in a mild form).

It's a sort of emotional blackmail.

Well son, you will follow in my footsteps and become my living avatar when I die, or you will branch out on your own and forever be a non-working facsimile of the man that bore you from his loins. Tough choice ah? Some dilemma to start life with.






Do you just become Daddy's sidekick, a sort of 'Mini-Me' or do you take the road less traveled (and maybe even get disinherited when you change your name by deed poll)?





Years ago, children did not have the life choices they do now, no matter how bad your upbringing. Even a child born to shitty parents can thrive, if in an ideal environment it finds loving foster parents, takes time to study and get his head down, responds to positive influences and role models that steer them away from the abyss that is abundant pornography and drugs (to just name two evils off the top of my head). It's possible but unlikely of course. As much chance of being sexually abused as there is on winning the lottery of having functional adults around you.

But it's possible. Only a few decades back if you came from a powerful dynastic family you sucked it up buttercup because that was your lot in life for better or for worse, and usually for better, so it's not hard to see why most went along with it.

Today it's seen as crass; kind of inferring some kind of presumed social status that if you really have, you really wouldn't have to advertise. Bit like double-hyphened names. Another thing with double-hyphened names is that they usually sound clumsy, because you can choose your words carefully and even the words that make up your poetry, but you can't choose your surname, bit like you can choose your friends, but not your family.

Some double-barreled names roll off the tongue. (Scuzzi, that was the phrase I was looking for)

A 'Parker-Bowles' is eminently more presentable than a 'Rogers-Fanny'.

Ditto, a 'Lloyd-George' compared to a 'Hardleigh-Hadderchance'.

Then again 'Hardleigh-Hadderchance' is a pretty fucking cool last name especially if your first name is 'Bradley'!

Let's reframe and go back to our potential scenario of introducing our young son at kindergarten:

Hi, this is Bradley Hardleigh-Hadderchance!

(everyone just turns around and looks at each other like 'WTF?')

Top that motherfuckers!




(01-19-2020 09:20 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  ...

I mean, good grief, even the bloody English royal family doesn't do this anymore.
Especially these days, a king's birth name has as much to do with his regnal name as birth name does for the guy on the Papal throne.

George VI's full name was Albert Frederick Arthur George - he took the name George because Albert was seen as too Germanic and because he wanted to keep continuity with his father George V's reign and minimise the disastrous reign of his elder brother Edward VIII. Queen Victoria was christened Alexandrina. George VI's grandfather, Edward VII, was Albert Edward. When he eventually winds up on the throne, Charles is likely to take the name George VII in honour of his grandfather and, ironically, to avoid the bad associations with the other kings who've had that name - Charles I (executed) and Charles II (reigned during the Great Fire of London, had 12 bastard children and no trueborn ones, was succeeded by James II who was deposed in 1688 by a European cousin).
...


I knew it. I knew it. I bloody knew it! Paracelsus is a bloody Royalist.

I can see him there with his little Union Jack flag on a stick, waving it franticly as Liz passes by at 99MPH (and trying not to get run over), shouting "Go Liz, Go Liz, Go Liz" in a thick Strine accent (and with a half-eaten fucking 'roo sanger that is hanging out of the back pocket of his half-unwashed jeans, bit like Bruce Springsteen, but just not half-as-cool). And he has the sheer gall to call others 'peasants'! Go figure.

Talking of the Royals, there was a big brouhahahaha here recently about a song chosen by Harry and Megs - by The Stone Roses. They are a band famous for being quite anti-Royalist.

I'll just leave this here for ol' Paracelsus to get his knickers in a twist over:






Sending out a message?


Tear me apart and boil my bones
I'll not rest till she's lost her throne
My aim is true my message is clear
It's curtains for you, Elizabeth my dear




That wasn't the paricular song they chose, and besides, the reference would have gone over 90 percent of the population's heads, but still...
01-21-2020 06:31 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like Rigsby's post:
Emancipator, mr_ks
Simeon_Strangelight Offline
Hawk
*******
Gold Member

Posts: 20,264
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation: 232
Post: #14
RE: Naming your son '<your name> Jr'
I would be against it.

It's probably because Donald Trump II wasn't up. Or the first grandkid would be Donald Trump the THIRD.

Though I understand the sentiment and there isn't much wrong against it - names are often part and parcel of the fashion of the times. Junior does not have the right kind of Conan the Barbarian jr. feel to me. The second and third - more so.....
01-22-2020 07:18 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Parlay44 Offline
Peacock
******
Gold Member

Posts: 6,602
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 67
Post: #15
RE: Naming your son '<your name> Jr'
It’s a tradition of keeping family names alive. Women do it as well. Usually with a deceased grandmother’s or aunt’s name.

Team Nachos
01-22-2020 07:27 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
PixelFree Offline
Woodpecker
**

Posts: 358
Joined: Sep 2017
Reputation: 11
Post: #16
RE: Naming your son '<your name> Jr'
(01-21-2020 06:31 PM)Rigsby Wrote:  The problems really start when your name is 'Junior', and you decide to carry the tradition on.

Introducing your young son at the kindergarten:

[i]Hi, this is Junior Junior!

Reminds me of hyphenated surnames, which are lame.

Hi my name is Sarah Smith-Jones-Brown-Livingstone, I come from a long line of women with chips on their shoulders.
(This post was last modified: 01-22-2020 09:47 PM by PixelFree.)
01-22-2020 09:43 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Saul Bellow Offline
Pigeon

Posts: 7
Joined: Nov 2019
Reputation: 0
Post: #17
RE: Naming your son '<your name> Jr'
(01-19-2020 06:03 AM)mr_ks Wrote:  Nothing wrong with being called 'Junior' your whole life, especially if your father is a well-to-do boomer.

Not everyone wants to remain within his father's shadow.
01-23-2020 06:34 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Paracelsus Offline
Crow
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 6,302
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation: 150
Post: #18
RE: Naming your son '<your name> Jr'
(01-21-2020 06:31 PM)Rigsby Wrote:  I knew it. I knew it. I bloody knew it! Paracelsus is a bloody Royalist.

I can see him there with his little Union Jack flag on a stick, waving it franticly as Liz passes by at 99MPH (and trying not to get run over), shouting "Go Liz, Go Liz, Go Liz" in a thick Strine accent (and with a half-eaten fucking 'roo sanger that is hanging out of the back pocket of his half-unwashed jeans, bit like Bruce Springsteen, but just not half-as-cool). And he has the sheer gall to call others 'peasants'! Go figure.








Remissas, discite, vivet.
God save us from people who mean well. -storm
01-25-2020 06:29 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes Paracelsus's post:
Rigsby
Rigsby Offline
Pelican
****
Gold Member

Posts: 1,667
Joined: May 2014
Reputation: 75
Post: #19
RE: Naming your son '<your name> Jr'
(01-25-2020 06:29 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  








I like the first one a lot!

The second one not so much.
01-26-2020 07:30 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Ghibellino Offline
Pigeon

Posts: 2
Joined: Feb 2020
Reputation: 0
Post: #20
RE: Naming your son '<your name> Jr'
If the goal is to signal good breeding in an Anglo context, you’d be better off using the mother’s maiden name as a middle name, possibly combined with another middle name. Throughout Europe, including Britain, it used to be popular to name the first child after the paternal grandparent of the corresponding gender, the second after the corresponding maternal grandparent, the third one after the corresponding parent, and so on; this rule is still followed amongst the more traditionally minded Greeks and Italians. It was, of course, never a hard rule: Pitt the Younger was the Elder’s second son.
02-02-2020 06:24 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes Ghibellino's post:
NoMoreTO
PixelFree Offline
Woodpecker
**

Posts: 358
Joined: Sep 2017
Reputation: 11
Post: #21
RE: Naming your son '<your name> Jr'
(02-02-2020 06:24 AM)Ghibellino Wrote:  If the goal is to signal good breeding in an Anglo context,

Ahhh OK, now I get it. It's to signal good breeding. i.e. you have a close, tight knit family AND know who your Dad was AND he has an identity worth passing on AND it's something other elite do.

Reminds me of how family trees are 'racist'... because only certain people can trace their lineage on 23andme and Ancestry.com from those uploaded ship logs and other historical documents.
02-02-2020 07:21 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
bugsy Offline
Pigeon

Posts: 1
Joined: Jan 2020
Reputation: 0
Post: #22
RE: Naming your son '<your name> Jr'
Kids benefit from high expectations, sense of tradition, heritage, and purpose. The intent of so many cultural traditions is to inculcate children with a sense of who they are supposed to be and where they come from. And an inherited name also serves this purpose.

Having said that, it's kind of creepy and weird. LeBron regrets naming his son after himself.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com...a-44978813
(This post was last modified: 02-20-2020 10:21 AM by bugsy.)
02-20-2020 10:20 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
robreke Offline
Ostrich
****
Gold Member

Posts: 2,109
Joined: Apr 2014
Reputation: 67
Post: #23
RE: Naming your son '<your name> Jr'
A lot of the American astronauts during the space race were juniors. I think it was the Mercury astronauts.

Some popular news piece came out back then explaining that juniors, at least back in those days, tended to have a high likelihood of success in life.

My Dad explained this to me when explaining why I was a Jr.

Made sense to me. I've done alright.

A Man has free choice to the extent that he is rational - St. Aquinas
(This post was last modified: 02-20-2020 07:53 PM by robreke.)
02-20-2020 07:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | RooshV.com | Return to Top | Return to Content | Mobile Version | RSS Syndication